Comments on: Update on WWE Changing the Survivor Series PPV and More

By: ¿]¿

¿]¿ — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:20:34 +0000

I thinks its a shame if they really go ahead and change Survivor Series. WWE should really go back to like it used to be. 4 on 4 elimination style, and whoever is left standing is the sole survivior.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: LVW

LVW — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:25:11 +0000

Maybe they should cut down to 8 PPVs a year because I think part of the problem is having them once a month makes them kind of stale. I still watch all of them and that’s just what I think in general.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:19:16 +0000

i like survivor series every year, they should get back to the traditional survivor matches with one group against another. and no one will ever forget survivor series 1997

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: Bazerko

Bazerko — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:07:10 +0000

If they are going to re-tool Survivor Series….how about making the main event War Games? I know Vince doesn’t like messing with ideas that weren’t his…BUT come on War Games has to be resurrected.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: James

James — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:23:38 +0000

We like Survivor Series, we DON’T like the story-lines leading into the PPV or the wrestlers involved.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:58:26 +0000

Part of the reason Survivor Series 09 failed was because they had Bragging Rights come immediately before it. I mean we just saw a 7 on 7 match, why would we want to see a 5 on 5 at the next ppv?

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: Daniel Stockwell

Daniel Stockwell — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:32:13 +0000

Survivor Series has suffered from bad booking the last few years but it has also suffered because of its place in the calender. It may have been 08 or 07 but I remember the WWE having three PPV’s within 2 months…it’s too much. The fact that WWE never focuses on building the Survivor matches doesn’t help either. They need to build them up rather then chuck stars together casually.

BTW Mabry, I’m surprised and somewhat disappointed that WWE have opted not to bring back KOTR, it was a great concept which considering all the PPV name changes, the WWE seem to love as of late. Honestly, I haven’t minded most except MITB which for me, has become a stable of Mania. It wouldn’t be special as it’s own PPV. I can’t understand why WWE are not bringing something great back like KOTR and choosing to create something which is ultimately destroying the unique quality about a particular match. Just Strange.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: annonymouse

annonymouse — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:30:47 +0000

i dont’ even know why they call it survivor series anymore. they haven’t done any kind of 4 way matches with the survivors moving on in ages. that’s what made that ppv fun. seeing 4 man tag teams that were thrown together and then the winners went on to another match that night. great concept but the last 10 years or so have failed miserably

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: Mabry

Mabry — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:40:17 +0000

Bring back the King of the Ring….

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0

By: !?

!? — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:28:36 +0000

I agree, Survivor Series has been a long standing tradition for generations and to see them toss that away like garbage is an absolute disgrace. Don’t blame the PPV, blame the way that WWE booked it, seriously you book your WWE Championship match around hornswoggle and seriousy expected people to buy the PPV? Seriously.

Like or Dislike This Comment: 0 0