9 Responses to RAW Rating for Last Night and More from RAW, WWE Show Changes:

1. 

   WWE/FCW fan

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 5:50 PM

   would of expected RAW to get an higher rating as the show last night was pretty good

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

2. 

   THE REAL WRESTLING GOD

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 5:55 PM

   INTERESTING WITH THE 3.6 IT JUST SHOWS THE SAME PEOPLE R WATCHING RAW COULD BE CAUSE SOME PEOPLE WORK AT MY HOUSE RAW STARTS AT 6 AND IS OVER BY 8

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

3. 

   edgehead15

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 7:30 PM

   3.6 week after week now! It seems as if the hsow is getting no new viewers whatsoever.

   But really RAW should being doin 1.2′s dammit! I haven’t watched RAW since the last show of 2009. I may take a few glance here and there. I watched last night only for DX vs Miz/Show vs SES. And was disappointed with the result. A quickly 5 min put together tag teams wins instead of a well bit SES? GTFO.

   Any guys stop watching RAW! Give SD them 3.6! SD is the best right now! Well it has declined a bit sincr Taker and Batista returned but still.

   TNA……eh. Really imo pro wrestling has nothing good to offer and all deserve a damn 1.0 for the most. TNA started off really what and wtf happened?

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

4. 

   Robert

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 7:56 PM

   The last two RAWs of 2009 were pretty godawful. But I’ve enjoyed RAW since the January 4 episode for the most part. I’ve REALLY enjoyed the last two shows. But I agree, Smackdown is the best show right now. I don’t even read the spoilers anymore. C.M. Punk, Jericho, and Edge entertaining the hell out of me, while guys like Mysterio, Morrison, and Ziggler (push this guy) can get it done in the ring. The only thing that would make the show more perfect is if Mike Knox just squashed R-Truth.

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

5. 

   Rated E-dgehead

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 9:09 PM

   Do you even realize how could a 3.6 is? WWE Raw is a ratings legend. They aren’t getting 5′s anymore but VERY few shows do. To get that same rating consistantly is impressive. It’s not that they aren’t getting new viewersl; They are consistent, that’s hard to do. Net fans are so damn hard to please. Damn!

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

6. 

   DK Monster

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 10:49 PM

   You put up less lame-duck promos and put up actually good
   match-ups, it creates great shows.
   Last two weeks’ Raw had plenty of good matches which is
   obviously what we want.

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

7. 

   AJ

   Date: Feb 09, 2010 at 11:01 PM

   You guys don’t get it do you, you guys are the actual fans. The core base that actually tries to understand and improve the business. But anymore WWE has turned towards being a children’s program and a cheap gimmick, while TNA decided to try the formula that tanked WCW. They’re not what they used to be.

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

8. 

   Robert

   Date: Feb 10, 2010 at 2:59 AM

   I think the important distinction between TNA and WWE matches are that while TNA matches feature more action, WWE has matches that we CARE ABOUT. As in we care about the character, the storyline, and the moves they do actually make sense. I love TNA action but I don’t really care about the outcome of most of the matches. They don’t make an effort for the finishes to matter. The Pope beat A.J. Styles. That should be huge. But in the end, nobody really cared.

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0

9. 

   Whaleboski21

   Date: Feb 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM

   I think if Smackdown was live, and they hyped it up the same way as Raw and whatever, it would get better ratings. The storylines are better, the wrestling is better, and it is just a more entertaining show overall. Not the same stuff week after week.

   Like or Dislike This Comment: 0  0