Drama with the WWE Divas, WWE Unifying All Titles Soon?
Posted by Marc Middleton on Monday, August 30th, 2010
50 Responses to Drama with the WWE Divas, WWE Unifying All Titles Soon?:
Wrestling News MORE NEWS »
- Today’s Superstars Matches, Fake Edge Appearance Booked, Koslov
- Roddy Piper Talks One More Run and Piper’s Pit with The Rock & John Cena
- Batista Shows Off New Look In Video, Reason For Jim Ross At Raw
- The Undertaker & HBK Announced For Raw Next Month, Graham Released, Sherri
- Snuka News Following Surgery, McMahon Campaign Donations, Updated WWE Attendance
- 2/6 RAW Breakdown: Punk-Jericho Segment, Triple H’s Opener and More
- Update on RAW Delayed Viewership, Rough Travel for RAW, Tiffany, Hodge
- Backstage News on The Miz, Update on Hero Signing with WWE & More
- Update on Shaq Appearing for WWE, Final Stretch Before Mania, HOF Note
- Early Word on Royal Rumble Buys, Legends House Update, Beth vs. Tamina
- Mickie James On Bringing Back Alexis Laree, Shannon Moore Accepting Bookings
- New WWE Inbox Episode, WWE Announces TV Deal, WWE Superstars
- Hulk Hogan Says He’s Only Used Creative Control Once, Talks Ultimate Warrior
- Jim Ross Says He Doesn’t Hate TNA, Former Diva Added To ROH Roster, More
- The Rock Advertised For Show After WrestleMania, Who Austin Wants In The HOF
MMA/UFC News MORE MMA NEWS »
- Brock Lesnar Retires from UFC, WrestleMania & Lesnar Trend
- GSP Tears ACL, Interim Title Match Set
- UFC 140: Jones vs. Machida Full Fight Card
- M-1 Challenge 30: Zavurov vs. Enomoto This Friday
- Strikeforce Staying on Showtime
- UFC on FOX: Dos Santos vs. Velasquez Results
- Brock Lesnar gets No. 1 Contender Fight
- ProElite 2 results: Ex-UFC champs Sylvia and Arlovski Both Win
Wrestling Columns MORE COLUMNS »
Wrestling PhotosMORE WRESTLING PHOTOS »
- 39 Must See Revealing Pics of Kelly Kelly Showing Off on Skates!
- Very Hot New Screencaps of Mickie James in Pink Lingerie
- Must See New Pics of The Bellas Together in Tight Bathing Suits!
- Sexy New Pics of Maria Kanellis Posing in Referee Gear
- Maryse’s Very Sexy New Cavewoman Bikini Shoot!
- Must See New Pics of Torrie Wilson Posing in Various Sexy Outfits!
- Hot New Pics of Maxine Showing Off Her Curves
- Amazing New Pics of a Sweaty Stephanie McMahon Working Out
Wrestling Videos MORE VIDEOS »
- Oh Bilal Video: Elimination Chamber, will a Title Change Hands?!
- Latest WWE ‘Backstage Fallout’ – Backstage Interviews from SmackDown
- Video Interview: Arda Ocal of The Score
- Videos: WWE Debuts Three New Shows with Santino Marella and Others
- Oh Video Bilal: Royal Rumble Review
- Video: MVP and Shelton Benjamin Get Together for a 35-Minute YouTube Session
- Videos: First Episodes for Wrestling Comedy with Foley, Anderson & Cabana
- Vickie Guerrero and Kharma in WWE ’12
Loading ...
RawIsWar
Date: Aug 30, 2010 at 10:49 PMWhat the? so does this mean that their wont be anymore Raw & Smackdown wrestlers oon each show and the all the wrestlers will now show up on both shows like before… or does the Champion have to defend it on both brands now like the Tag Team unified championships…?
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Daniel Stockwell
Date: Aug 30, 2010 at 10:54 PM…a move like this, if it were to happen would enable the WWE to focus solely on it’s premier stars as they could show up on both brands. Sadly, this could assist in the burial of up and coming stars as they won’t be able to compete with the elite.
On the plus side, there will be more competition for the larger belts and with just one championship for each division, it could help build feuds leading into a PPV.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Dom
Date: Aug 30, 2010 at 11:02 PMthats actually a pretty good idea, but i think theres too much superstars to do it
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
zacca
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:02 AMI hope this means that titles will be defended more regularly, no more of this Miz going months without a title defense crap. Between both rosters, there will always be different superstars to challenge for a title.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Rob
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:03 AMI think they should keep IC, USA, WWE, WH and have 1 tag and female
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
john
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:04 AMActually, it wont change a whole lot at all in my opinion. Four titles overall, at least, means two title per show. if you want to contend for one title you can jump ship and switch shows. I dont know, just a thought.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Paul123
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:13 AMdepending on how wwe handles this, unifying the titles could either be a great smart choice or it could ruin them.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
CC
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:21 AMWhy are people acting like this has never happened before and that its a bad idea. Simple fact is, the brand extension and 2 of each title is the worst thing WWE ever did, and for the bulk of its history there was only one of each title.
The only thing I would say is that the IC and US title should probably stay seperate as there has nearly always been at least two mid card belts (the IC, European, Cruiser{light heavyweight} and Hardcore all existed together at one point).
While I am not one for living in the past like TNA seem to be, but getting back to the core titles rather than diluting them is a better idea.
With less titles, it should hopefully mean they start rebuilding up the tag division as well.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
ox slang shoot
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:08 AMignorant people with opinions is so very silly
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
kamoteng kahoy
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:20 AMIf its true, that’s basically like a quarter of the roster gone.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Sam_Tha_Great
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:41 AMOne world title is dumb. They can unifiy the rest but one world title screws up the the mid card and lowers superstars. Also WWE is mad the “Divas” are causing too much drama lol that’s ironic.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
kamoteng kahoy
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:42 AMbtw, regarding divas, does any one have news on su yung? amerasian girl signed by wwe last may
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Paul123
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:49 AMat kamoteng kahoy,, i was wondering the same thing. i cant wait for her debut but im afraid wwe might treat her unfairly like they did with savannah. she was a great wrestler that never got to show it.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
serg
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 2:17 AMHere we go again. The have unified their titles many times. The concept isn’t exciting anymore. If you pay attention you know that in the next couple years they will re-introduce one if not all of the titles they are eliminating. The creative juices have died.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Shittlestix
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 2:46 AMthere trying to bring back stuff that died along time ago while creating a new product, yes there will be more main eventers for the world title but thts the only competitive championships they dont make mathes for the IC, US, Divas, Womans or tag- team ones anymore they should bring back the cruiserweight
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
MABRY
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 3:01 AMThey shoul keep the IC and US titles, no need to unify those. The rest, i think it could be good, as many has said, more defends and maybe that could bring some prestige back to the IC and US belts…. i got a doubt though…. what hapens to re historial of the belts that would disapear?….
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
hkmmhmj
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 3:07 AMwhat about briging right
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
In Grind We Crust
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 3:34 AMit was a lot better when each brand had a set of titles. it started going down hill with the unified tag titles IMO, but who knows, maybe this could work.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
lamar williams
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AMThe WWE should leave all the titles alone and focus on coming up with some better storylines. At this rate, the WWE is losing its fans that have grow up with this company for many, many, many years. There catering 2 much 2 superstars who make them the huge amounts of money each, and every time they come out to the ring and talk too damn much to the audicence……(John Cena)!!!! I am slowly losing interest each week with this company. The Housewives Series on Bravo is more entertaining then this S.H.I.T !!!!!!
If man only knew how to build a time machine!!!!!!!!
ATTITUDE ERA WILL RETURN, NOT RIGHT NOW
BUT IT WILL RETURN WATCH AND SEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
JLOVE69
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 4:12 AMIf they were to do a World Title unification at WM, then what would they do with the winner of the Royal Rumble? It would be stupid to have 1 of the world champs win that match to set it up!
And stop having someone win a championship shot in a match to only have them put that shot on the line at the next PPV. So stupid!
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
kamoteng kahoy
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 4:18 AM@Paul123: Yes, that’s really possible since they always F up talented women wrestlers. But this has got me really wondering if she has really been signed or not. 4 months and no mention of her or any FCW appearances. For an international star it would be understandable but for a local star?
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
kamoteng kahoy
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 4:25 AMRegarding title unifications. Its okay for the 2 womens titles because of the lack of talent depth but for the others its crazy. Think about it this way: after the purchase of WCW and ECW and the whole Alliance angle, WWE’s roster became too big for one show. Hence the whole brand split. Allowing each show to have its own world title, midcard (US & IC), special (Womens & Cruiser) and tag team championship would give each brand’s superstars something to fight over. And then every year there’s a draft to rearrange the rosters and refreshen the wrestling scene. Unifying titles doesn’t necessarily mean that it will bring more competition and prestige to a title. How many stars would feud for the main world title? There are about 10 bonafide main eventers and several upper midcarders = Clusterf*ck. Same for the midcard. Only the tagteam and womens would be refreshed (also if they add an x-division like title). The best solution would be cut at least 1/4 or 1/2 of the roster.
Also unifying doesn’t necessarily work. Just look at the current WWE tag team titles. It was formed after unifying 2 lackluster tag divs yet it barely has any prestige or competition to it. How many times has the Hart Dynasty defended it since winning it, once or twice?
The main thing that WWE’s creative team should focus on is pushing more superstars, both as single wrestlers and tag teams. Divas should be pushed as well. The more the superstars are pushed, the more competiton there would be for the titles and there would be less of a need to unify titles.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
hkmmhmj
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 5:02 AMbXKLNVx m klk cx kcx c KL ,cbk,z lvm,b n vmxccuxc ik kcm xckck mcm k,mcn kcn b mfbmcnzncm mbn zkcnbfckbc bf .k vb m.k,bn cxl,mckb k ,lkvklvnckbnm m bmbm,cnbkbn vm v n mnkb c egde nk vbjndbcjbf cena j jfkbm vkjmbnjkmb.cbmv bbm rko bk kcmv bkm m.vk bnk jkbbjkv mbknc mvbjdb m hhh kbkbfnbklvckbf v d m kdkv mb cv v xv cxvcvxcv z cvngfbvnfghgfbv nghnb mm nb ghm b
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Trixie
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 6:40 AMhkmmhmj: What??
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
superfunk
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 7:25 AMIf they have to unify the titles to focus on the, that’s pretty sad. There’s no reason they can’t have interesting match ups and feuds with each title as it is. They simply don’t care enough to do so. If they unify, they’re basically admitting their incompetence and there’s not guarantee that they’ll get it right with just one set of titles, anyway. So frustrating.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
SGT_Robinson
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 8:02 AMThat unifying titles mess failed. Yeah Triple H beat all the singles champs to merge the belts. Then came that brand extension mess. As most have stared there needs to be better storylines. Miz needs to loss the US title. Kori should have never lost the IC belt. Cryme Tyme should have been Tag Champs long ago. I thought the focus was to develop other stars. Sheamus needs to drop the World title. Kane will lose his belt to the Undertaker. Ted Dibiase should have won Money in the Bank not Miz. It is real funny how the WWE tells us not to email storyline suggestions. When we all could do a better job then fheur creative staff!!! Email me at kevinr1@yahoo.com
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Rich
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 8:06 AMHonestly if they unify all the titles then i’m starting to watch tna cause i don’t want too see several of my favorite superstarts get buried because of this decision..it would ruin alot of superstars chances to be a champion so fuck this and i hope they scrap the idea
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Bking
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 9:00 AMUnify the titles but please bring back a cruiserweight title and division. It could really adda major kick to the shows and the people are present to do this. Matches with Danial Bryan, Kaval, Kofi, JTG, Bourne, Tyson Kidd, Justin Gabriel. I mean who wouldnt want to see these matches? Bourne and Kofi are huge fan (and for vinces sake little kid) favorites. Gabriel would make a great lead heel. Lets have these matches and this belt and stop just using these guys as squash for the fat boys of wrestling
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Matt
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 9:16 AMIts simple, one company= one heavyweight champion, one midcard champion, one woman champion, one tag champion, and possibly one lowercard champion. Enough of that brand split shit
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
snoop
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 10:15 AMMaybe I’m the only one that remembers this but when the whole brand split started there was only one main title. Think of it this way at a ppv like fatal 4way there would be the champ and 3 superstars that possibly arent on the same show. Having a mixed brand main event or title defenses could liven up having the same feuds ppv after ppv.
Bragging Rights would become a better ppv since they could play up the “balance of power” of the shows.
MITB could be a even bigger win for some up and coming superstar if theres only one belt. Maybe if they do add a cruiserweight/X division belt that could be the other MITB match to start of the show.
Once this whole nexus thing ends, whenever that may be, it could be that Raw vs Smackdown mentality and liven up fueds and the entire title picture for the wwe.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
jeffey
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 11:27 AMOMG John Cena vs The Undertaker thats probably it
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Will Henderson
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 11:36 AMi can see this as a setup to the pending acquisition of TNA Wrestling when Panda Energy says “F*** it” and sell it off. can’t have three women’s championship, three tag team championship, three world championship, three mid-card titles (IC, US Champion, TNA TV Champion).
or WWE may just do away with the “Brand Extension” and go back to being one brand with three shows. just like before 2002.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
charlemange
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:15 PMi cant understand them doing this then the ppvs will have only 3 title matches thats like an hour but really i dont get the point of this this means that one show will have a champion that would make the other show extremly boring i dont see them doing this it seems extremly stupid even for them if anything they could unify the womens championship and but what will all the divas on the other show be fueding for this is why they bought the title to smackdown in the first place but they should bring back the cruiserweight title though
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
john
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 12:17 PMTHEY ALREADY DID THIS
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Amazed
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:03 PMWHY R PEOPLE SAYING THIS IS STUPID? THIS IS THE WAY IT USED BE AND IMO IS BETTER THAN THE CURRENT SITUATION.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
EDGE-3000
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:45 PMIts understandable to unify the Women’s titles and Tag belts cause those division suck They could push a lot more people though with 2 World titles and U.S/I.C title. If they do choose to unify all the belts, they should just end the brand extention and have 1 roster. It would be a better decision.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
jay
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 1:46 PMtaker vs cena @ wrestlemania 27 im calling it. Also an idea that was being talked about. If taker even makes it that long. anyone notice on raw that he seemed out of it duno if they were doing that for story lines or what
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Cm Mark
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 2:10 PMNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! The WHC is bigger than the WWE. It’s the only legitimate belt. I hate you WWE. You ruin everything!
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
The Black Scorpion
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 4:36 PMIf its Champion vs Champion at Wrestlemania, what would be the point of winning the Royal Rumble?
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
kamoteng kahoy
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 5:39 PMPeople see that if they unify all titles HALF of the roster would do nothing but have meaningless feuds. Here’s a breakdown
Unified World Title (10 wrestlers) = clusterf*ck
Unified Midcard Title (about 28 or so wrestlers, upper midcarders, true midcarders, and jobbers/lower midcardarders) = clusterf*ck
only the tag team div and womens div wud benefit.
see if they go back to the 1 roster format and even a 2 roster format with 1 set of titles then half would do nothing or would be future endeavored
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
erik
Date: Aug 31, 2010 at 5:48 PMwwe should killed womens divison al of it’s talent wrestlers are gone mickie, katie lea, fired jillian and gail jobbing losing all time melina and beth is only ones left. kill divison i am sick of mctaker and her little bitch layla winning all time. kill the divison divas divison has been dead since 2006!
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
James
Date: Sep 01, 2010 at 1:56 AMWow first the pg era now this I remember back in the day the IC title and US title use to mean something it was like if u were the IC champ u were considered the no 1 contender for the world title i remember them doing that with the warrior vs hogan and so of the great IC matches like MR PERFECT and the HONKY TONK MAN. The mid card titles were used to push u into a main event spot not this we will give a belt just to hold on to because it doesnt mean anything and it might get u over which is untrue to REAL wrestling fans and not the kids they have 2 shows and we know the only show that would have title matches at ppvs would be raw because of cena hhh and others that will remain there after the smackdown move next month. So is this a good idea yes for the women because there are not that many of them in the divas division. For the other titles no it is not it will bury risinng stars and give us the same matches over and over and over cena vs ????
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Matt
Date: Sep 01, 2010 at 6:25 AMwhat it means is soon SuperCena will be the only top tier champion.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
robert
Date: Sep 01, 2010 at 12:41 PMgood god finally, I have hated this brand crap since 2007, it is so stale, get back to what brought you to the game, everyone on every show.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Mohammed
Date: Sep 02, 2010 at 6:03 AMI dont know why but I feel that the prestige that comes from uniting titles (especially world/wwe) is gone. If I were to see the titles get united now I wouldn’t get excited as I did when Y2J became the first undisputed champion or when Kurt became the Euro continental champion.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Rikthagreat
Date: Sep 02, 2010 at 5:37 PMTo The Black Scorpion:
this goes out to u ever thought that maybe the winner of the royal rumble challenges a wwe champion or world heavyweight champion at elimination chamber and then faces the other champion at wrestlemania 27 to unify the top titles?
think about it
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
Mark
Date: Sep 03, 2010 at 2:51 AMThree way match at Wrestlemania. Rumble winner, WH Champ, WWE Champ.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
tony
Date: Sep 03, 2010 at 11:53 PManyone think cena gona turn heel anytime soon,,, undertaker needs an opponent for mania and his matches are built up from before the new year
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
erik
Date: Sep 06, 2010 at 6:56 PM@tony it is going to be hhh he wants his revenge from his wrestlmania17 lost 9 years ago to undertaker. so wwe is going to have son in law hhh 13 time wwe champion end undertaker streak imo.
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0
erik
Date: Sep 07, 2010 at 6:00 AM@lamar that is what i have been fro last 7 weeks when it is 9pm monday night i watch house wife’s of new jersey ever monday at 9pm they are so much entertaining then divas and wwe lame pg shit!
Like or Dislike This Comment:
0 
0